add to wish list | library


47 of 53 recommend this,
would you recommend it?

yes | no

Support this site by purchasing from these vendors using the paid links below. As an Amazon Associate SA-CD.net earns from qualifying purchases.
 
amazon.ca
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
amazon.de
 
amazon.fr
amazon.it
 
jpc

Reviews: Mahler: Symphony No. 2 - San Francisco/Michael Tilson Thomas

read discussion

Reviews: 5

Review by krisjan November 12, 2004 (11 of 14 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:
The text for this review has been moved to the new site. You can read it here:

http://www.HRAudio.net/showmusic.php?title=2475#reviews

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by lenw June 21, 2005 (3 of 6 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
The SFSO SACD version has a wonderful three dimensional sound. In terms of sonics the Leonard Berstein NY Philharmonic 1988 RBCD version sounds a bit harsh by comparison, but it is a much more involving presentation and contains much greater energy, especially during the ending climax which has a much better low frequency. Too bad SACD wasn’t around when the Berstein recording was made.

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by Dr. O August 5, 2005 (4 of 5 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
Another WOW! performance by MTT and the SFS!

The sonics are superb, as we already expect from this magnificent series. What is to talk about here is the performance - not only from the orchestra, but just as importantly from the conductor!

Mahler paints his music on the canvas of time much like Diego Rivera did with paint - a mural of many different ideas and feelings - a collage of sorts which all conspire to create an overwhelming whole. Each individual section - just like Rivera or Michelangelo within the Sistine Chapel - is in itself worthy of observation and contemplation.

MTT understands this very well! He treats each and every section with the utmost of love and care. Still, he is cognizant of the whole and each movements final destination point. For example, in the amazing Finale of this mighty symphony, the conductor does not "give too much away" before the final resounding chord!

Each movement is a jewel. The pacing and the balance is delicious and convincing! Another marvelous offering from Maestro Thomas and the SFS! Bravo!!!

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by jlaurson October 10, 2007 (6 of 6 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
It may be coincidence that my Mahler collection contains more Mahler 2nd symphonies than any other. It may also be coincidence that that symphony seems to have been particularly well served by the recording industry, but its popularity is certainly no coincidence. It combines all the elements that make Mahler's symphonies great. It is typical of his work, yet accessible, imposing; has folk influences, mystic gravity; it has voice solos and a choir; it isn't as over-the-top as the garishly divine Eighth nor as forbidding as the Seventh, more varied than the First or Fifth.

I have not yet heard a bad recording of it, either. "One-piece-conductor" Gilbert Kaplan brings raw excitement to it in his LSO recording (now on Conifer — sadly no longer with the lavish presentation but with better sound and at mid-price); in his second recording (of the newly edited score) with the Vienna Philharmonic (DG) he achieves perfect sound and great polish. Simon Rattle (EMI) presents the Birmingham SO at its best and is blessed with Arleen Auger and Janet Baker as the soloists. [Note: I'm not QUITE as enchanted with the Rattle recording anymore as I was when the MTT came out.] Claudio Abbado's first two recordings (Chicago, Berlin, DG) were splendid [though the middle one with the superbly growling W.Meier leaves something to be desired], and his third (Lucerne, DG—see ionarts review) tops both for capturing the excitement of the live performance. Bruno Walter (Sony) brings his intimate knowledge of Mahler to his recording, and Seiji Ozawa has the most electrifying version in his all-Japanese recording with the Saito Kinen Orchestra (Sony). Leonard Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic (DG) is broader but still heart-on-sleeve his second time around with that band, and perhaps it is because of this competition that Otto Klemperer's seminal version with Schwartzkopf and Rössl-Majdan (EMI) is a bit disappointing upon revisiting it. Add to these (and several more) the latest installment of Michael Tilson Thomas's Mahler cycle with the San Francisco Symphony Orchestra on their own label. His soloists are Isabel Bayrakdarian (soprano) and Lorraine Hunt Lieberson (mezzo soprano), and the recording enters the catalogue as a success.

I have to note that I did not yet have a chance to listen to the recording in SACD surround sound, clearly an essential part of the issue's attraction (limiting the direct competition in the field to Messrs. Zander and Kaplan II.) But the performance itself is worth a review.

Hunt Lieberson has become one of the greatest mezzos over the course of the last six years, and yet somehow did so overnight. Her Bach and Handel recordings showcase her rich voice, casting hues that many other singers should envy, if they don't already. At the same time, her natural and honest tone is perfectly suited to Urlicht ("Sehr feierlich, aber schlicht"—Very solemn, but simple/plain). It is worth noting that that simplicity and naturalness in the "Primal Light" fourth movement come out of a score where the first 35 bars witness no fewer than 21 changes of meter.

MTT's take on this symphony, recorded live in June 2004, feels elastic, lithe (but not light), sometimes tip-toeing, sometimes smashing with all the requisite weight into the sea of music. There is freshness to how he bursts into the finale, and the brass are well captured, in tune, and never brash or blazing. The soundstage is closer than in Kaplan's recording, where the distant horns, in their attempt to attain maximum effect and authenticity, border on the gimmicky. In stereo, the orchestra is well balanced.

The two-disc set splits the symphony after the first movement (23:19), giving each listener who should be so inclined the chance to observe the Mahler-mandated five-minute break before resuming with the next three movements before the finale. The choral entry in that 5th movement is sufficiently hushed but maybe not the most impressive. But the SFSO, by now well versed in Mahler, picks it up wonderfully, transporting the movement to a plane where Mme. Bayrakdarian enters with her soft voice at maximum vibrato. MTT gathers the fine momentum for the last five minutes and brings the symphony to a rousing finish.

This second symphony is a strong contender in a strong field. A perfectly fine account for anyone looking for a first Mahler 2nd, but not the only one to have and not an unambiguous first choice. Ozawa and Abbado III (especially if the latter ever comes out as an SACD [note: it never did]) ought not to be missed, and I'll probably turn to Rattle (sadly overpriced as it is) just as often [No, I won't. But now I love Boulez and Fischer quite a bit!!]. For those who have followed MTT it might be a must-have, although the surround sound [that I've only heard once] is not particularly flattering, denting its chances to become the High-Fidelity listener's favorite.

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by Luukas January 16, 2014 (6 of 8 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:    
Stunning experience, maybe the best. I heard five recordings of this work: London Symphony Orchestra and Choir, Valery Gergiev,(LSO Live), Bamberg Symphony Orchestra, Jonathan Nott, (Tudor), London Philharmonic Orchestra and Choir, Vladimir Jurowski,(LPO), Paavo Järvi (Virgin) and Leonard Bernstein (DG). Gergiev's and Nott's recordings are SACD. My own favourite was Jurowski's performance with London Symphony Orchestra, until I heard Michael Tilson Thomas' performance with San Francisco's Symphony Orchestra. Thomas' recording is exciting and stunning, specially in symphony's long finale. The fourth movement is very beautiful. Thomas ends it in long silence. It is good effects, because finale's begin is stunning. Off-stage bands are cool: I heard them in my surround speakers. Very strong listening experience, I recommend! Don't hesitate, buy this!

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no